DCARTS

SPONTANEITY OVER PRECISION: Q&A WITH DOMINIE NASH

What inspired you to experiment with the process of printmaking? Who is your favorite printmaking artist?

It happened sort of by accident many years ago. I had been dyeing fabric and yarn, and a friend suggested we try to do batik. We got some books and muddled along until we figured it out. Eventually I got tired of dealing with the wax, but by then was hooked on putting images on cloth and continued to learn a variety of processes. It is still my favorite part of my practice, though I have a long way to go to be a proper printmaker.

I am lucky to have had the opportunity to learn from and to work in close contact with some wonderful printmakers: Nancy McNamara,Aline Feldman, Julio Valdez, and the members past and present of the Graphics Workshop— and too many others to mention. I am also inspired by the prints of Jasper Johns and Helen Frankenthaler

Can you talk more about the process of monoprinting, and what it has added to your work?

Since I am more interested in  spontaneity than precision, and do not need to produce editions, monoprinting is perfect for my needs and is very adaptable to working on fabric. The variation in each print pleases me, and so does reworking or overprinting. I have done simple monoprinting by inking a plate and marking marks in the ink, made collagraph plates and gelatin plates, and use a kind of monoprint technique on  a screen with dyes, in which each subsequent print becomes unique as the dye is gradually used up.

My work is basically collage, with the printed fabrics becoming the elements of the collage. They add so much texture and depth to my work that I can’t imagine creating my work without printing.

What effect do you believe viewing many different techniques and approaches in one gallery will have on the viewer?

The print processes  I use vary in the way they convey the essence of the image I want to portray: crisp, soft, blurry,rough, etc, each process giving a particular effect. My work always involves layers, or the illusion of layers. I hope the variety of print processes and stitching will help the  viewer to look beneath the surface to find these layers. I’d like it to be a process of exploration and discovery.

In your bio, you state “since I didn’t know the rules, I was free to break them and to achieve the kind of spontaneity I was seeking.” Do you advise for young artists to take a similar approach?

Well, it works for me. Everyone needs to learn some technique in their chosen medium, and you can save a lot of time by gathering information from  books, classes, or other artists—I unashamedly pick people’s brains, always hoping to return the favor. However, so much can be learned by just trying and experimenting, and using the resulting mistakes and accidents (which will certainly happen) as opportunities to gain new insights and directions. Stay away from words like “should” or ‘can’t”

in Artist Interviews 0 comments

CONCEPTUAL CHARACTER: Q&A WITH SASCHA HUGHES-CALEY

As a multimedia artist, with the No Joke installation at Hillyer featuring performance documentation, sculpture, and video work, how do you ensure unity in your pieces?

I trust that formal and conceptual unity will be there. It is important for me to see how each piece works in conversation with the other. For No Joke, I had to privilege the unity of each individual work and trust that a larger conceptual unity would be present in its installation.

The show really centers around two fictional characters (performance documentation and various monuments to each) as well as a video installation.

What inspired No Joke’s focus on cultural miscommunication as a critique of the American wellness market? What thoughts do you hope to inspire in viewers?

During two visits to India while I was in graduate school (first for a friend’s wedding and second on a research grant), I turned a pretty critical eye on various approaches to self-help and the American wellness market.

Since becoming a yoga and meditation teacher in 2010, I have been trying to put my finger on something in my yoga community (Los Angeles at the time, then Washington, DC and Philadelphia) that felt extreme. I started thinking about our attempts to make an experience endless or transcendental and a certain myth of progress. I wanted to bring the human pieces together.

I have utmost respect for complementary and alternative healing modalities and self-guided improvement (if it makes you feel better and doesn’t hurt anyone or the environment, go for it) but I also think it is important to engage with these themes boldly and head-on.

At the forefront of this investigation is a conceptual character that I devised and perform named Shanti Paz. Shanti Paz is my crack at examining a sense of individualism and triumphalism that is uniquely American. When we culturally lose track of our own religions, political systems, and so on, we begin reaching to other systems for guidance. For example, many Americans, like Shanti Paz herself, have taken over or appropriated elements of a traditionally Indian spiritual practice and are serving as modern-day “gurus” or life coaches in hopes of helping us arrive at enlightenment. However, her perspective is binary, and therefore, blind in a way. While embodying a self-less meditator, Shanti is entitled and unwilling to ask for permission. The tension within one person trying to embrace spiritual completeness renders her completely unqualified.

In a similar vein, there is a disconnect between what we imagine to be the yogic approach to shedding one’s ego and the American focus on building it up. This is exceptionally complicated as a female studying these traditions, in that the contemporary voices telling us to to “lean in” and build up ego are louder than ever. In most of the performances thus far, Shanti Paz is in some sort of crisis. She becomes less of a model of spiritual enlightenment, and more a model of general unawareness.

How has your experience as an actor influenced your artwork?

I think my experience as an actor makes me hyperaware of my body, breath, and voice – like any actor, I try to identify my given circumstances and find “neutral” before I take on a new role or position in my work.  

Improvisation is important to me – few studio moves are ever written in capital letters, and I am very interested in character as a vehicle for the self.

I am also fascinated by how language is written and performed. We think of scripts a lot when imagining the theater, but what about how pop culture writes these narratives for us every day? For example, look at our ceremonial languages (or lack thereof) around death and dying. I want to know: if I re-enact something like an ending, or an apology, can I make it fuller? More truthful?

Are there any artists, historical or current, that have influenced your work?

This list changes and grows every day but voices that I always come back to:  Andrea Fraser, Mary Reid Kelley, Tino Sehgal, Rineke Dijkstra, Alex Bagg, Shannon Plumb, Nancy Davenport, Eve Sussman, early Sam Taylor-Wood, Bruce Nauman, Tammy Ben-Tor, Chantal Akerman, Massimo Bartolini, Jackie Tileston, Stan Douglas, Matt Freedman, and Marc Blumthal.

As adjunct faculty at two universities in Philadelphia, what is the lesson that you most want your art students to learn?

That it is okay to make fail – the most important thing is to take the risk. Command+Z exists for a reason. Paint can dry and be reapplied later. This fear of breaking something or messing up happens a lot intro-level classes, especially video. The goal is to identify what went wrong, how to fix it, and move forward with a strategy to make certain it doesn’t happen again. After that…the freedom!

in Artist Interviews 0 comments

COLLABORATIVE VIEWERS: Q&A WITH HELOISA ESCUDERO

How did you begin creating installation artwork, and what has the medium allowed you to do?

I began doing installation artwork in graduate school in 2001.  The medium allows me to interact with the space, which makes it easier to connect with viewers who after all interact with the space and the art.

What are the biggest challenges of creating installation work?

I do not see any challenges in creating installation work.  I love every aspect of creating installation work even if there are challenges along the way.  I welcome them as positive experiences in the creative process.

In your artist statement, you state that “art has become more than a painting or a sculpture,” how do you think this evolution has taken place?

In my case, this evolution has taken place when being an artist became having the power to see art in everyday things in combination with developing an imaginative eye for abstract concepts.

Where do you see your artwork going after this piece? Do you intend to continue on the theme of enabling innate creativity in others?

This work will develop and grow to be another interactive installation with new collaborative viewers and in a different space.  I will always try to create art that includes the viewers as an interactive element of creativity.

What place do you find yourself going to for inspiration? Are you drawn more to nature or to urban areas to induce creativity?

I find inspiration everywhere.  Sometimes while at my job, at times while hiking or walking in the city.  It can come at anytime; at times I have a hard time getting away from it. I get overwhelmed with the amount of ideas that go through my head.  I cannot complete all of them so getting them makes me anxious sometimes.

in Artist Interviews 0 comments

LIVELY AWARENESS OF OURSELVES: Q&A WITH CHRISTINA SHMIGEL

Why did you choose an installation piece to convey your experience moving to Shanghai?

Installation is my preferred way of working: I’m inspired by the places where I live and by the spaces in which I present my interpretations of those places. I think of my installations as creating a kind of theater space in which the viewers, rather than spectators, are the players. When I first arrived in China, I was thrilled to discover the traditional gardens. Full of architecture, hidden surprises, shifts of scale & view point, they are experienced thru slow revelation, in time and thru memory; those are exactly the elements that interest me in creating an installation. The Shanghai experience lends itself to spectacle & so it’s a great fit to represent it thru installation work.

In your artist’s statement, you state that you intend for visitors to experience the feelings which accompany the idea of “otherness.” What do you hope visitors will learn from this perspective?

When we encounter “otherness,” we host a variety of responses: we’re excited/curious/ frustrated/frightened/puzzled/delighted. “Otherness” can brings us into a lively awareness of ourselves: it gives us what the writer Italo Calvino called a “negative mirror.” Our experience of “otherness” can broaden our understanding of the world, & that, hopefully, extends our capacity for an empathetic relationship with the unfamiliar.

For those who know China, many of the objects in the show will be resonate with humor and familiarity. For those who don’t know China, their experience will be like that of the traveler: coming to know a place by seeing connections, repetitions, slowly making sense of what surrounds them.

What is the most inspiring aspect of creating art in Shanghai?

The markets! There’s the streets of the hardware market: everything you could buy from a catalogue in the States but all out on display in tiny storefronts & back lanes.  And the street for metal stock with rods of copper and aluminum and brass & steel in dimensions I’ve never even dreamt of. There’s the notions market with every manner of ribbon & tassle & zipper & cord plus reflective safety cloth & tiny scissors & shoulder pads: so much that in a half hour’s time I have to face the fact that my creativity is just not up to the task! The fabric market, the artificial flower market, the market of seasonal decorations that I think of Red Street for its Chinese New Year look…all amazing & inspiring. And then there’s the food markets & the shops that sell household goods and and and…

Do you have any studio traditions, such as playing music as you work on your pieces?

So as not to deal with “blank page” anxiety when I get to the studio, I usually end my studio day by leaving myself an easy, meditative task to start in on the next day…or the next month as I move between a studio in Shanghai (pop. 22 miliion) and another in Bakersville, NC (pop. 800.) I also like to have some “daily practice” project going, something like the Shanghai Daily book that’s in one of the bottom drawers of the Cabinet of Curiosities.

Your artist’s bio discusses your participation in residencies and group exhibitions in numerous countries. What are the unique benefits and challenges of working on the international scale?

As a sculptor working internationally, it’s shipping that’s the biggest challenge: coming from China, the Cabinet was held over in Customs, arriving two weeks late for the opening! The benefit for me is that I love to experience new places but I’m not a great tourist so I really love it when I have an art task to do in a foreign place. It allows me to find my “family” of makers & see a new place through their aesthetic interests. There’s also something about making art without the comfort of your own tools and sources that’s super enlivening to the creative juices!

in Artist Interviews 0 comments

WORLD OF THE SENSES: ARTIST Q&A WITH LINA ALATTAR

Your new body of work explores identity, and how the surrounding world effects this self-exploration. Why do you think it is important to explore these deeper themes through art?

Art, to me, explores the deeper themes of our lives. It makes our experiences richer and deeper and in doing so, nourishes us on a deeper level.  It is through the process of art-making that we reach a certain balance.

You also place a clear emphasis on the natural world. What place or landscape most inspires you?

A walk in the woods, the sound of the sea, or best of all, tending to my vegetable garden are experiences that I bring into my studio.  I would say, the simple beauty and rhythm of nature is what I seek in my life and in my art.  My travels and living abroad has afforded me the memories of diverse landscape.  I notice the settle changes in color, light, sunsets, the world of the senses.

Why do you think paint is the best medium to explore both these themes and the paradoxes of landscapes?

It’s the best medium for me at this point in my career.  The lush quality of the paint allows me to express myself on the canvas and create emotive extremes. It also lends itself to a visual vocabulary what carries the purity of the moment. For me, it has the ability to make the invisible revealed.

Did you have any artists that have inspired your work – both a teacher of yours or a well-known artist that has influenced your work?

Richard Diebenkorn is one such artist. His work has influenced mine in some mysterious ways.  I’m intrigued by how he uses paint in such a semantic way, really stretches the boundaries.

in Artist Interviews 0 comments