DCARTS

UNCHARTED TERRITORY: BART O’REILLY

Artist, “Repression, Resurgence, Reemergence”

Your artist’s statement places emphasis on the present, between avoiding placing all interest in the origin of objects, utilizing improvisational exercises, and focusing on perception. Do you believe this central theme of the present should be used more when trying to understand identity?

I think that in many ways we now live in an endless state of the present. This is not to be confused with being present or mindfulness in the Eastern sense. That is something I strive for daily and attempt to integrate in my studio practice. As culture however I feel that we have lost a sense of history and we no longer anticipate a better future as we did say during the hay day of late 19th century early 20th century Modernism.

Our 21st Century sense of self or identity is very much based on how we are seen now. Right now in this present moment what image will we present of ourselves? I believe the centrality of the image is stronger than ever. How we present ourselves is rooted in now. We rarely look and when we do it is just nostalgia. We look forward in fear. Environmental catastrophe and the end of abundant resources are all becoming real and immediate realities in the so- called developed world.

As a child I read Transformer comics and the future was set in 2006. I often feel that I am living beyond the future I projected as a child. As a result I feel we are now in uncharted territory as a species. Sure I cling to old identities like Irish artist, father, husband and teacher but traditional notions of identity have been shaken and the postmodern prophecy of the fractured self is coming through. Again this has a positive counter meaning in Eastern philosophy. Things such as letting go of self and deflating ego are highly valued in this regard. This is not to be confused with the cultural crisis of identity that we see in 21st Century America and Western Europe. This is an alienated loss of self rather than one that connects. It’s the kind of thing that seems increasingly dangerous, especially here in the US.

Having said all that I do not proclaim to know the central theme of the present or anything even close. The idea that the history of the object is unknowable is kind of skeptical and I realize that. I just feel the certainties that we cling to are often used to manipulate us through the guise of ideology. Often as a group we cling to mantras and proclaim a blind certainties that I believe are very dangerous. Guns don’t kill people. People kill people for example.

How does this idea of present over history relate to the idea of an inherited or contemporary national identity?

My peers and I came of age in a very different Ireland to any generation that preceded us. We had the Celtic Tiger. Dublin was by the late 1990’s a bustling worldly city. Trade with the EU and the United States really seemed to be lifting the entire country out of difficult economic circumstances and I remember growing up feeling that being European rather than just Irish was ok. With a certain naivety I felt that Globalism was a good thing and something that should be embraced by a small country.

Of course we have all seen the downside to this. My interest in improvisation kind of comes from a desire to rebuild things at a small level and navigate uncertainty with a provisional approach. This might work today it may not apply tomorrow. This is the way I operate and it seems to work. What’s happening today? What does it require? How can I reassemble the parts just for right now? Frederic Jameson’s essay the Aesthetics of Singularity was very helpful to me in this regard.

in Artist Interviews 0 comments

CONFLICTING FEELINGS: COLETTE MURPHY

On your website, Bryan Wizemann describes your pieces as “haunted by a strong memory of youth, the culturally specific fantasies that one always carries as an immigrant to a new land.” Is this effect an inspiration for your pieces, or an involuntary result? 

As an artist I do not paint in response to emigrating from Ireland to America at the age of eighteen. I do not paint in response to my love of the landscape I grew up with. I do not paint directly to this or any one aspect of my life experience. I do however paint as a consequence of my experiences. With the belief that we do not choose the memories we carry with us, rather our memories are a collective of the meaningful events that transpired. The memories that “haunt” my work are in fact the memories that continue to survive. The collective of unresolved events that occurred amount to the moment in the studio when I put paint to the linen.

In order to lose myself in the work I come equipped with a skill set and a passionate response to the life I live at the time I live in and try to make sense of it all. Sometimes I wish to be free of the troubling events that caused me to leave Ireland. There was not one reason but a curiosity for a life beyond the land I lived in. I left because I needed to know more. I stay gone because I have attached myself to a new way of living but I leave behind a land and people that I love.

The Irish writers abroad (ie WB Yeats, Patrick Kavanagh), have written about the conflicting emotions of an emigrant. I do not want to abandon the great land that gave me life but in leaving it there is a feeling of guilt and of quitting. These nagging emotions interfere with my growth as an individual and in turn continue to show up and influence my paintings. It is a complex life. I am only Irish in America and in Ireland I am a Yank, I am a misplaced entity. Seeking my own identity and finding a fulcrum wherein I can find a balance of who I am between the two lands that I call home will always “haunt” the work I make.

in Artist Interviews 0 comments

VISCERALLY EXPRESSING THEMES: ERIN DEVINE

Why did you choose video as your medium for your piece? What are the unique possibilities and challenges that this medium offers?

My work is performative, whether live or in video.  Typically, I enact ambiguous gestures using my own body in the video format, and are based in visual metaphors of some central theme or narrative. For me, performance art is a very politicized form, full of potential to more viscerally express themes of disenfranchisement, or loss, or longing, because of its strong reliance upon the body as the central site of these experiences.  For this exhibition, I chose to work with a video installation, because I wanted to also address issues of how we experience memorialization, as well as who gets memorialized in history. I felt this could only occur best spatially because we are so accustomed to memorialization in the built form.

From your artist’s statement, it is clear that you draw inspiration from historical experiences of oppression and disenfranchisement. How has this piece made you think about current iterations of these issues?

In conceptualizing this piece, I was able to connect histories of oppression to ongoing conditions, as in the fraught relationship between the Church and women in Ireland, and to make parallels to present global concerns, such as the role of fundamentalist religious states and the disenfranchisement of women.  Celebrating the past accomplishments of women in history is a sort of generalized feminist legitimization of those women who have been overlooked by that history, and that would be one way of giving a platform to the women who fought in the Rising and have been left out of the memorialization of its heroes.  But to connect what they did to a more recent history, making parallels between taking up arms to taking up condoms as the Irish feminists did in the 70s, emphasizes a 100 year period of struggle for rights that are indelibly part of women’s bodies.  Both acts were extreme gestures of rebellion despite the oppression of the Church, and the point was not only to give attention to those acts but to question why these patriarchal structures or attitudes haven’t changed.

in Artist Interviews 0 comments

SEARCH FOR CONTEMPORARY IDENTITY: CONALL CARY

Your artist’s statement discusses a recent focus on the damage outdated conceptions of “masculinity” can have on contemporary young men. Does the theme of inherited identity present in this new focus have a connection to the exhibition on Irish identity? Why or why not?

In Ireland I think that traditional masculinity and traditional ‘Irishness’ both have roots in similar environments, such as The Church and a largely working class industrial and agricultural population. Both are transitioning to a world that is radically different, with a shift away from The Church and the diversification of the workforce to the I.T. sector and cities/urban development.

As such in many ways I think my work for this exhibition can be a commentary on both a ‘masculine’ or an ‘Irish’ search for contemporary identity.

What liberties and limitations does printmaking as a medium allow?

I often say that if I was allowed to make the piece that I initially had in my head it would always be worse than the piece that I end up making, and part of this is because the process of making a print puts its direction on the works regardless of the intentions of the artist, and to me I find this is what allows for an element of surprise and newness to emerge.

For me it is the ‘limitations’ of print that force me to be freer with the work, to let the forces of chance at work within a structured environment.

in Artist Interviews 0 comments

CONNECTING PHYSICALLY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY: Q&A WITH JACKIE HOYSTED

Jackie is the curator of June 2016 exhibition “Repression, Resurgence, Reemergence,” and the head of Visual Arts Programming for Solas Nua.

As the Director of Visual Arts for Solas Nua, the only non-profit organization in the United States dedicated to contemporary Irish arts, what is the most rewarding aspect of your position?

I really enjoy seeking out Irish artists and becoming familiar with their work and processes. It is very rewarding to be able to connect with them and create opportunities to showcase their work here in the US.  I think there is a great community of visual artists, creating really good work in Ireland and it makes me very proud to showcase it here.

Within your bio, it is stated that you are a native of Ireland and currently reside locally, in Maryland. How have your personal experiences with Irish identity impacted the process of putting together “Repression, Resurgence, Reemergence”?

Pulling together the show really made me think hard about who is Irish and that is reflected in the artists I selected to participate in the show.  I’ve been living in the US for twenty years now and and prior to that I lived in the UK and France but I still think of myself very much as Irish, even though here is my home now. So the mix of participants in the show comprises a selection of artists born and still living in Ireland; artists who have emigrated there and who have made it their home plus people like me who emigrated but has strong ties to Ireland and also some generational Irish-Americans who maintain strong cultural connections.

While curating this exhibition, were there any emotions or messages in the artwork or in your reception of pieces that surprised or challenged you?

I connected with all of the work at some level as each artist’s work spoke to me in different ways. I relate strongly to Helen O’Leary’s work which is about “making do” – I came from a relatively poor household so there was never any such thing as buying something , or wanting or getting. You just made do or made it yourself. I also particularly connected with Vanessa Donoso Lopez’s beautiful drawings. Vanessa is a Catalan artist living in Dublin and her work speaks about being an emigrant and living life through a second language. Some of her drawings show her moving with all her possessions  and it reminds me of how many times I moved homes as I moved to and from different countries. It seemed that my moving boxes were almost more important than my possessions.  She also talks about a living “diluted” life because she has to communicate through a second language and wonders what she misses out on by not understanding subtleties. Her experience reminds me of the years I lived in France and how I struggled communicating in another language.

Many of your own pieces include interactive elements. This exhibition consists of visual arts of many different forms. Due to the highly personal yet collective nature of the subject, personal national identity, do you view this exhibition as a different form of “interaction”? Why or why not?

I hadn’t thought of this but I definitely wanted the gallery audience to connect physically and psychologically with the work – whether that is peering at smaller work to discover what is really going on, standing back to take in a larger work, putting on headphones to be quiet and listen to sound of voices reading different text or staring looking at a video and wonder what is going on. Hopefully by having different experiences with each artwork, it encourages the viewer to wonder and ask more about what is behind the works.

in Artist Interviews 0 comments